Case Number

HCJ 316/63

Date Decided

1-23-1964

Decision Type

Original

Document Type

Full Opinion

Abstract

Whilst the second respondent was building a wharf in Kishon harbour, the first respondent issued a tender for the erection of a warehouse in the same place. The second respondent competed in the tender but its bid was not the lowest. Because, however, of the desire to have the job finished for the coming citrus marketing season and because of the difficulties apprehended if two different contractors worked on the site at the same time, the work was awarded to the second respondent after negotiations for a reduction of the price. Only the second respondent of all those competing knew of the urgency for carrying out the work. The petitioner whose bid was the lowest challenged the award.

Held (1) The purpose of a public tender is on the one hand to obtain as many bids as possible from among which the most appropriate one can be chosen and on the other hand to give an opportunity for fair competition on equal terms to all participants.

(2) A contract is not to be awarded on grounds not obvious from the nature of things and undisclosed in the tender. Matters which are withheld create from the outset a situation of inequality.

(3) It is not proper to issue a tender with the intention of afterwards negotiating a reduction in price with one or other bidder. A bid is to be accepted or rejected as it stands. The desire to save public funds may well be bona fide but that is not the only element in conducting public tenders.

Keywords

Contracts -- Interpretation, Contracts -- Pre-Contractual Negotiation, Contracts -- Terms

Download

Included in

Contracts Commons

Share

COinS