Publication Date

2-1991

Journal

UCLA Law Review

Abstract

The article examines the Supreme Court's inconsistent approach to affirmative action, particularly through the lens of *Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC*, which upheld the FCC's race-based policies to promote broadcast diversity. While the decision aligns with constitutional values of equality and free speech, the Court's opinions fail to coherently reconcile liberty and equality principles. The article argues for a more integrated framework to address the complexities of affirmative action jurisprudence and its intersection with First Amendment rights.

Volume

38

Issue

3

First Page

583

Last Page

636

Publisher

UCLA School of Law

Disciplines

Civil Rights and Discrimination | Constitutional Law | Fourteenth Amendment | Law

Share

COinS