Publication Date
1991
Journal
Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics
Abstract
An attorney convicted of a serious crime involving moral turpitude may be consequently disciplined for violation of DR 1-102(A)(5) of the Model Code of Professional Responsibility or Rule 8.4 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct without the need for relitigating the issue of the attorney's criminal guilt. Likewise, when an attorney is disbarred in one jurisdiction, he can be disbarred by another jurisdiction without relitigating the underlying facts which were the basis for the initial disbarment. When courts thus discipline lawyers, they are invoking collateral estoppel to prevent the attorney from relitigating an issue raised and resolved against him in a prior action even if the tribunal or cause of action is not, the same.
Volume
5
Issue
1
First Page
1
Last Page
34
Publisher
Georgetown University Law Center
Keywords
Collateral Estoppel, Legal Practice and Procedure, Estoppel, Jurisprudence, Torts
Disciplines
Jurisprudence | Law | Torts
Recommended Citation
Lester Brickman & John M. Bibona,
Collateral Estoppel as a Basis for Attorney Discipline: The Next Step,
5
Geo. J. Legal Ethics
1
(1991).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/315