Publication Date
4-2003
Journal
University of Miami Law Review
Abstract
The article critiques Pierre Schlag's normative legal thought, arguing that while his descriptive critique of law as a fiction is accurate, his normative proposal to abolish law is contradictory and flawed. By incorporating Lacanian psychoanalysis, the authors contend that law, as part of the symbolic order, is constitutive of subjectivity and cannot be abolished. They propose that legal scholarship should instead focus on exposing law's role in shaping subjectivity rather than seeking to eliminate it. The analysis emphasizes that law, like language, is an intersubjective system sustained by collective belief, despite lacking a concrete foundation.
Volume
57
Issue
3
First Page
767
Last Page
790
Publisher
University of Miami School of Law
Disciplines
Commercial Law | Jurisprudence | Law | Law and Society | Torts
Recommended Citation
Jeanne L. Schroeder & David G. Carlson,
Law's Non-Existent Empire,
57
U. Miami L. Rev.
767
(2003).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1252