Publication Date

Winter 1996

Journal

American Bankruptcy Law Journal

Abstract

The article examines the legal implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Dewsnup v. Timm on the bifurcation of undersecured claims in bankruptcy law. It critiques the ruling for creating confusion and potential inequities, arguing that it may diverge from the intent of the Bankruptcy Code. The analysis highlights the need for clearer guidelines to ensure consistent and fair treatment of secured and unsecured claims across different bankruptcy chapters.

Volume

70

Issue

1

First Page

1

Last Page

54

Publisher

National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges (NCBJ)

Disciplines

Bankruptcy Law | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

Download

Share

COinS