Publication Date
1996
Journal
Washington and Lee Law Review
Abstract
Contingency fee abuses are attracting increased public attention. Particular interest is focused on the enormous contingency fees generated by mass tort litigation; in some cases, lawyers are collecting multi-million dollar fees essentially for performing paralegal work. In addition, the relationship between the availability of enormous contingency fees and the amassing of thousands of claims of injury in order to dramatically shift the litigation dynamic in favor of plaintiffs is becoming increasingly apparent. For example, the possibility that major ongoing massive litigations, such as those involving silicone breast implants and the as yet nascent litigation involving the contraceptive Norplant, have much less to do with injury and much more to do with contingency fees is being increasingly broached in the press, even in newspapers that usually have opposed most tort reform efforts.
Volume
53
Issue
4
First Page
1339
Last Page
1380
Publisher
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Disciplines
Law | Legal Profession | Medical Jurisprudence | Torts
Recommended Citation
Lester Brickman,
Contingency Fee Abuses, Ethical Mandates, and the Disciplinary System: The Case Against Case-by-Case Enforcement,
53
Wash. & Lee L. Rev.
1339
(1996).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1196