Cardozo Law Review de•novo
Cardozo Law Review de·novo is the online companion to the Cardozo Law Review and publishes shorter works of legal scholarship written by scholars, professors, judges, and practitioners. The journal features timely articles addressing current legal issues, responses to pieces published in the print journal, and student notes. In addition, de·novo hosts online symposia that bring together scholars to examine emerging legal topics and encourage timely academic debate.
Submissions from 2013
The Second Circuit’s En Banc Crisis, Mario Lucero
Innovation in China: Fragmentation, Structured Uncertainty, and Technology Standards, Michael Murphree and Dan Breznitz
Using Valuation-Based Decision Making to Increase the Efficiency of China’s Patent Subsidy Strategies, William J. Murphy and John L. Orcutt
Zizhu Chuangxin and China’s Self-Driven Innovation: Calling for a Holistic Perspective, Ken Shao
Collaborative Innovation and Economic Growth: A Comment on China’s Innovation Policies, Chen Wang and Jon Sallet
Symmetry For Symmetry’s Sake: Why Bose Does Not Require Independent Review of a Trial Court’s First-Amendment-Favorable Findings of Fact, Joshua Wurtzel
Five Oft-Repeated Questions about China’s Recent Rise as a Patent Power, Peter K. Yu
Zadoff on Kwall: A Historian’s Critique, Ethan Zadoff
