Skip to main content

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

As the Cardozo Law Review’s online journal, de·novo publishes shorter works of legal scholarship written by legal scholars, professors, judges, and practitioners, including articles on timely legal issues, as well as responses to articles that appear in the print journal. In addition, de·novo publishes several student notes each year. De·novo hosts “online symposia” that feature pieces of legal scholarship centered around selected legal issues in order to foster a timely and topical debate.

Submissions from 2013 2013

The Second Circuit’s En Banc Crisis, Mario Lucero

Innovation in China: Fragmentation, Structured Uncertainty, and Technology Standards, Michael Murphree and Dan Breznitz

Using Valuation-Based Decision Making to Increase the Efficiency of China’s Patent Subsidy Strategies, William J. Murphy and John L. Orcutt

Zizhu Chuangxin and China’s Self-Driven Innovation: Calling for a Holistic Perspective, Ken Shao

Collaborative Innovation and Economic Growth: A Comment on China’s Innovation Policies, Chen Wang and Jon Sallet

Symmetry For Symmetry’s Sake: Why Bose Does Not Require Independent Review of a Trial Court’s First-Amendment-Favorable Findings of Fact, Joshua Wurtzel

Five Oft-Repeated Questions about China’s Recent Rise as a Patent Power, Peter K. Yu

Zadoff on Kwall: A Historian’s Critique, Ethan Zadoff