Cardozo Law Review de•novo
As the Cardozo Law Review’s online journal, de·novo publishes shorter works of legal scholarship written by legal scholars, professors, judges, and practitioners, including articles on timely legal issues, as well as responses to articles that appear in the print journal. In addition, de·novo publishes several student notes each year. De·novo hosts “online symposia” that feature pieces of legal scholarship centered around selected legal issues in order to foster a timely and topical debate.
Submissions from 2013
Symmetry For Symmetry’s Sake: Why Bose Does Not Require Independent Review of a Trial Court’s First-Amendment-Favorable Findings of Fact, Joshua Wurtzel
Five Oft-Repeated Questions about China’s Recent Rise as a Patent Power, Peter K. Yu
Zadoff on Kwall: A Historian’s Critique, Ethan Zadoff
