Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Document Type

Commentary

Publication Date

2018

Graduation Year

2019

Abstract

In this comment, we argue that whatever courts and legislatures decide to do about the other issues raised by digital animation, they should preserve the ability to use digital technology to restore and remaster existing works. In this case, at least, the benefits of digital reanimation thoroughly swamp any possible costs (and frankly, we have a hard time finding any meaningful costs). Courts and legislators should ensure that publicity rights are never allowed to trump society’s interest in having access to already created works of culture.

Publisher

Cardozo Law Review de·novo

Volume

2018

First Page

1

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS