Cardozo Law Review
Vol. 15, Iss. 6-7
Prefatory Matter
Symposia
Taking Daubert’s “Focus” Seriously: The Methodology/Conclusion Distinction
Kenneth J. Chesebro
Check Your Crystal Ball at the Courthouse Door, Please: Exploring the Past, Understanding the Present, and Worrying About the Future of Scientific Evidence
David L. Faigman, Elise Porter, and Michael J. Saks
Should Federal Evidence Rules Trump State Tort Policy? The Federalism Values Daubert Ignored
Michael H. Gottesman
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Redefining the Bases for Admissibility of Expert Scientific Testimony
Clifton T. Hutchinson and Danny S. Ashby
Conflict Resolution in the Courts: The Role of Science
Anthony Z. Roisman
DNA and Daubert
Barry C. Scheck
Daubert: Interpreting the Federal Rules of Evidence
Paul C. Giannelli
The Reliability of Expert Psychological Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions
Lisa R. Askowitz and Michael H. Graham
The Meaning of Daubert and What That Means for Forensic Science
Randolph N. Jonakait
The Admissibility of Scientific Evidence After Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
David E. Bernstein
Solomon Meets Galileo (And Isn’t Quite Sure What to Do with Him)
Brian Stuart Koukoutchos
The Next Step After Daubert: Developing a Similarly Epistemological Approach to Ensuring the Reliability of Nonscientific Expert Testimony
Edward J. Imwinkelried
Article
Book Review
Girls Lean Back Everywhere: The Law of Obscenity and the Assault on Genius By Edward de Grazia
Robert M. O'Neil
Note
The Priority of Postpetition Retainers, Carve-Outs, and Interim Compensation Under the Bankruptcy Code
Criag B. Cooper