Cardozo Law Review
Abstract
The most intriguing aspect of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is that the Supreme Court never applied its new analytic framework for the admissibility of scientific evidence to the facts of the case. Either the deviltry, or the genius, of the Daubert decision lies in the details.
Keywords
Science and Technology Law, Evidence, Scientific Evidence, Scientific Research
Disciplines
Evidence | Law | Science and Technology Law
Recommended Citation
Barry C. Scheck,
DNA and Daubert,
15
Cardozo L. Rev.
1959
(1994).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/clr/vol15/iss6/9