The Doctrine of Non-Inquiry and the Preservation of Human Rights:-Is There Room for Reconciliation?

Authors

• Michael S. Topiel

Abstract

The note explores the tension between individual human rights under international law and state interests in combating cross-border crime, focusing on the doctrine of noninquiry in extradition cases. It argues that while the Convention Against Torture imposes obligations to prevent extradition to situations of torture, the doctrine of noninquiry—where courts avoid scrutinizing the requesting state’s justice system—remains crucial for maintaining separation of powers and diplomatic relations. The analysis highlights the balancing act between protecting human rights and ensuring international cooperation in law enforcement.

Disciplines

Courts | Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Human Rights Law | Immigration Law | Jurisdiction | Jurisprudence | Law | Law Enforcement and Corrections

Recommended Citation

Michael S. Topiel, The Doctrine of Non-Inquiry and the Preservation of Human Rights:-Is There Room for Reconciliation?, 9 Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L. 389 (2001).
Available at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol9/iss2/7