Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Abstract
The note examines the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) decision in the *Case Concerning East Timor*, highlighting the tension between factual sovereignty and legal principles in international law. It argues that the ICJ's dismissal of Portugal's case against Australia due to lack of jurisdiction underscored the limitations of international adjudication in resolving sovereignty disputes. The case raises critical questions about the recognition of sovereignty acquired through force, the role of erga omnes obligations, and the UN's role in territorial disputes.
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | International Trade Law | Law | Law of the Sea
Recommended Citation
Michael S. French-Merril,
The Role of the United Nations and Recognition in Sovereignty Determinations: How Australia Breached Its International Obligations in Ratifying the Tmor Gap Treaty,
8
Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L.
285
(2000).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol8/iss2/6
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Law of the Sea Commons