Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Abstract
The article examines the tension between France's dirigiste traditions and the introduction of competition law, particularly through the 1986 Competition Statute. While the statute aimed to establish legal principles to protect competition and reduce government discretion, the enduring influence of dirigisme—emphasizing state control and administrative prerogatives—continues to challenge the effectiveness of competition law. The *Ville de Pamiers* case highlights this conflict, as it tests the boundaries of competition law's applicability to public services and administrative acts. The analysis reveals that the struggle to balance competition law with dirigiste traditions reflects broader conflicts in redefining the role of government in a liberalizing economy.
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | Contracts | Law
Recommended Citation
David J. Gerber & Richard Azarnia,
Dirigisme and the Challenge of Competition Law in France,
3
Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L.
9
(1995).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol3/iss1/4