Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Abstract
The note examines the legal and policy implications of adopting Australia's strict gun laws in the United States, arguing that such measures would likely violate the Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms. While Australia's National Firearms Agreement (NFA) has successfully reduced gun violence, the U.S. constitutional framework, particularly the Second Amendment, poses significant legal barriers to replicating similar laws. The analysis highlights the cultural and legal differences between the two countries, emphasizing that compulsory gun buybacks and restrictions on firearms for self-defense would face constitutional challenges in the U.S.
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | Law | Law and Race | Law Enforcement and Corrections | Second Amendment
Recommended Citation
Jonathan Weg,
We Don't Come From a Land Down Under: How Adopting Australia's Gun Laws Would Violate the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,
24
Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L.
657
(2016).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol24/iss3/7
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Second Amendment Commons