Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Abstract
The note argues that China's Antimonopoly Law (AML), while modeled after Western antitrust laws, is often applied in a protectionist manner, disproportionately targeting foreign companies to shield domestic industries and state-owned enterprises. This selective enforcement contrasts with the U.S. antitrust system, which prioritizes fair competition and consumer welfare. The note advocates for aligning AML enforcement with international standards to promote a level playing field and foster long-term economic growth.
Disciplines
Antitrust and Trade Regulation | Comparative and Foreign Law | International Trade Law | Law
Recommended Citation
Jillian Bray,
Firmly Grasping the Knife: An Investigation of the Asymmetric Application of Chinese Antitrust Law as a Protectionist Tool,
24
Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L.
351
(2016).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol24/iss2/5
Included in
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons