•  
  •  
 

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

Abstract

The article examines the gap between the legal framework protecting indigenous rights and its practical implementation, focusing on Chile's failure to uphold the right to consultation under ILO Convention 169. Despite having robust laws, including the Indigenous Law (No. 19.253) and the incorporation of Convention 169 into its Constitution, Chile's judiciary and government often misunderstand the timing and scope of consultation, undermining the effectiveness of indigenous rights. The case of the Atacameño people highlights how the denial of early consultation in geothermal exploration concessions jeopardizes indigenous property, natural resources, and water rights, demonstrating the need for clearer legal standards and earlier engagement in decision-making processes.

Disciplines

Civil Rights and Discrimination | Law

Share

COinS