Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Abstract
The note examines the tension between promoting innovation and safeguarding national security, focusing on the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951. It argues that while the Act is designed to protect sensitive inventions, extending its secrecy powers to economically significant patents would be counterproductive, unconstitutional, and harmful to U.S. competitiveness. The analysis highlights the challenges of balancing economic security, intellectual property rights, and the constitutional mandate to promote scientific progress.
Disciplines
Intellectual Property Law | Law | Law and Economics | Military, War, and Peace | National Security Law
Recommended Citation
Alexandra H. Katich,
Innovation Worth Sharing: Seeking Balance Between Innovation Policy and National Security,
23
Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L.
413
(2015).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol23/iss2/7
Included in
Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, National Security Law Commons