Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Abstract
The note examines the varying disclosure requirements for arbitrators in the United States and internationally, focusing on the standards for determining when an arbitral award may be vacated due to arbitrator partiality or bias. It highlights the tension between ensuring impartiality and maintaining the finality of arbitration decisions, advocating for broad initial disclosures to uphold the integrity and fairness of the process while preserving party autonomy.
Disciplines
Commercial Law | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Recommended Citation
Lindsay Melworm,
Biased? Prove It: Addressing Arbitrator Bias and the Merits of Implementing Broad Disclosure Standards,
22
Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L.
431
(2014).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol22/iss2/7
Included in
Commercial Law Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons