Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Abstract
The article challenges the notion of fragmentation in international law, arguing that the proliferation of international adjudicatory bodies, such as the ICJ, WTO DSB, and ECJ, does not lead to fragmentation but instead fosters integration and coherence in international jurisprudence. It highlights the alignment of procedures, shared sources of law, and interpretative approaches among these bodies, demonstrating that institutional diversity enhances efficiency and enriches international law rather than causing discord. The article emphasizes the role of these institutions in addressing complex legal issues, ensuring legal certainty, and promoting transparency and inclusivity in global dispute resolution.
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Human Rights Law | International Law | Jurisdiction | Law | Law and Economics
Recommended Citation
Francis N. Botchway,
Forums for International Economic Adjudication: Threads in Fragments,
20
Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L.
639
(2012).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol20/iss3/4
Included in
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, Law and Economics Commons