Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
Abstract
The note examines the global e-waste crisis, focusing on the regulatory frameworks in the European Union, United States, and Japan. It critiques the effectiveness of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) models and highlights the challenges of enforcing e-waste policies across jurisdictions. The author argues for a balanced approach in U.S. policy, combining elements of the EU’s EPR framework with considerations for domestic and international implications to address the environmental and health risks posed by e-waste.
Disciplines
Administrative Law | Antitrust and Trade Regulation | Environmental Law | International Trade Law | Law | Legislation | State and Local Government Law
Recommended Citation
Phoenix Pak,
Haste Makes E-Waste: A Comparative Analysis of How the United States Should Approach the Growing E-Waste Threat,
16
Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L.
241
(2008).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjicl/vol16/iss1/8
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Environmental Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Legislation Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons