Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Abstract
This Article seeks to provide insights into the "black box" of early treaty-making processes by undertaking a case study of the development of the United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation, known colloquially as the Singapore Convention on Mediation (Singapore Convention). The discussion focuses on several issues that have seldom been addressed in the legal literature, including the way in which a proposal for an international treaty makes its way to the relevant decision-makers and how those decision-makers determine which of the various alternatives to pursue. The analysis also considers how interested individuals can assist the treaty-proposing process, particularly if they are not a member of a non-governmental organization ("NGO").
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | Conflict of Laws | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | International Law | Law
Recommended Citation
S. I. Strong,
The Role of Empirical Research and Dispute System Design in Proposing and Developing International Treaties: A Case Study of the Singapore Convention on Mediation,
20
Cardozo J. Conflict Resol.
1103
(2019).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cjcr/vol20/iss4/11
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, International Law Commons