Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
Abstract
The note argues that the current regulatory distinctions between broadcast and cable television in the United States are outdated and should be unified to better protect children from indecent content while respecting adult First Amendment rights. It proposes adopting a consistent "safe harbor" provision for both broadcast and basic cable television, combined with the use of the V-chip technology, as a constitutionally sound and less restrictive means of achieving the government's dual objectives of supporting parental authority and safeguarding children's well-being.
Disciplines
Administrative Law | Air and Space Law | Communications Law | Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law | Law | Law and Gender
Recommended Citation
Marie A. Ryan,
To V or Not to V - That is the Regulatory Question: The Role of the V-Chip in Government Regulation of Broadcast and Cable Indecency,
4
Cardozo J. Equal Rts. & Soc. Just.
137
(1997).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cardozoersj/vol4/iss1/7
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Air and Space Law Commons, Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons