Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
Abstract
The article examines the evolving role of judicial assistance to self-represented litigants (SRLs) in federal courts, arguing that while the Supreme Court has maintained a strict no-assistance policy, lower courts have increasingly recognized the need for accommodations to ensure fair trials. The author advocates for a more consistent and expansive approach to judicial assistance, aligning with due process and the constitutional right to self-representation, while emphasizing the importance of maintaining judicial impartiality.
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility | Legal Profession
Recommended Citation
Jona Goldschmidt,
Required, Permissible, and Impermissible Forms of Federal Judicial Assistance to Self-Represented Litigants: Toward Establishment of a Judicial Duty of Reasonable Assistance,
25
Cardozo J. Equal Rts. & Soc. Just.
217
(2019).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cardozoersj/vol25/iss2/2
Included in
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal Profession Commons