Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
Abstract
The article critically examines the historical and legal underpinnings of the marital rape exemption in common law, arguing that the concept of consent within marriage has been used to undermine women's autonomy and perpetuate gender inequality. It traces the evolution of this exemption from its roots in Sir Matthew Hale's 17th-century legal writings to its eventual abolition in England and Australia, highlighting the broader implications for women's citizenship and bodily integrity.
Disciplines
Common Law | Jurisprudence | Law | Law and Gender
Recommended Citation
Katherine O'Donovan,
Consent to Marital Rape: Common Law Oxymoron?,
2
Cardozo J. Equal Rts. & Soc. Just.
91
(1995).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cardozoersj/vol2/iss1/8
Included in
Common Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Gender Commons