Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
Abstract
The note critiques the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) and its implementation, arguing that while its intent to protect children from online pornography is laudable, the mandated use of Internet filters is flawed. The study demonstrates that current filtering technology often overblocks access to critical nonpornographic health information, particularly affecting vulnerable populations like teenagers seeking sexual health resources. The Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. American Library Association upheld CIPA, dismissing less restrictive alternatives, but the article contends that this approach may harm patrons by restricting access to essential information.
Disciplines
Communications Law | Constitutional Law | Internet Law | Law | Law and Gender
Recommended Citation
Heidi Wachs,
Permissive Pornography: The Selective Censorship of the Internet Under CIPA,
11
Cardozo J. Equal Rts. & Soc. Just.
441
(2005).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cardozoersj/vol11/iss2/9
Included in
Communications Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons