Chapter 22: Deconstructing Constitutional Identity in Light of the Turn to Populism

Chapter 22: Deconstructing Constitutional Identity in Light of the Turn to Populism

Description

Constitutional identity, although remaining distinct from national identity, does like the latter carve out an imagined community. It must process and reprocess material to promote a vision that integrates the ethnos and the demos in a constitutionally viable manner. In this pursuit, the elaboration of constitutional identity relies on three principal interpretive devices: negation, metaphor, and metonymy. The objective is to integrate the polity as a whole, the individuals subject to the constitution, and the plurality of groups within the nation that possess a legitimate claim to constitutional recognition. The resulting construct must draw on national identity to reinforce unity and depart from the latter where necessary to maintain constitutional integrity – e.g., to deescalate ethnic strife within the polity by banning ethnic-based political parties. The turn to populism poses a challenge that calls upon reframing constitutional identity. Indeed, as populism by its very nature casts only part of the people as the people, and labels those not included as the enemy, it calls for disaggregating and recombining existing liberal constitutional identities. We illustrate the adverse effect of populism’s recourse to ethnic cleavages and to religion in reframing constitutional identity through the salient example of Viktor Orban’s Hungary.

ISBN

9781009473194

Editor(s)

Ran Hirschl and Yaniv Roznai

Start Page

286

Publication Date

3-14-2024

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Keywords

constitutional identity, ethnos, demos, populism, the people, the enemy, disaggregation

Disciplines

Comparative and Foreign Law | Constitutional Law | Law

Chapter 22: Deconstructing Constitutional Identity in Light of the Turn to Populism

Share

COinS