Publication Date

1984

Journal

Indiana Law Journal

Abstract

The article examines whether the Constitution requires a damage remedy for unconstitutional land use ordinances and analyzes the policy implications of such a remedy. It argues that while awarding damages can compensate victims and influence behavior, the threat of liability may discourage useful government action. The author concludes that municipal damage liability for unconstitutional land use ordinances is generally unwise, except when the ordinance results from bad faith or deliberate obstruction of constitutional rights.

Volume

60

Issue

1

First Page

113

Last Page

162

Publisher

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Disciplines

Civil Rights and Discrimination | First Amendment | Land Use Law | Law | Legal Remedies

Share

COinS