Title

The Aftermath of Hobby Lobby: HSAs and HRAs as the Least Restrictive Means

Authors

Edward A. Zelinsky, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of LawFollow

Files

Description

In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) does not require closely-held corporations’ employer-sponsored medical plans to provide forms of contraception that shareholders of such corporations object to on religious grounds. The question now raised is how the President, Congress, and the departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Treasury and Labor, ought to respond to the Hobby Lobby decision.

Publication Date

2014

Volume

42

Publisher

Rutgers Law Record

First Page

110

Disciplines

Courts | First Amendment | Law | Tax Law

Recommended Citation

Edward A. Zelinsky, The Aftermath of Hobby Lobby: HSAs and HRAs as the Least Restrictive Means, 42 Rutgers Law Record 110 (2014).
Available at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/530