Publication Date
2014
Journal
Rutgers Law Record
Abstract
In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) does not require closely-held corporations’ employer-sponsored medical plans to provide forms of contraception that shareholders of such corporations object to on religious grounds. The question now raised is how the President, Congress, and the departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Treasury and Labor, ought to respond to the Hobby Lobby decision.
Volume
42
First Page
110
Publisher
Rutgers Law School
Disciplines
Courts | First Amendment | Law | Tax Law
Recommended Citation
Edward A. Zelinsky,
The Aftermath of Hobby Lobby: HSAs and HRAs as the Least Restrictive Means,
42
Rutgers Law Record
110
(2014).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/530
