Publication Date

2014

Journal

Rutgers Law Record

Abstract

In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) does not require closely-held corporations’ employer-sponsored medical plans to provide forms of contraception that shareholders of such corporations object to on religious grounds. The question now raised is how the President, Congress, and the departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Treasury and Labor, ought to respond to the Hobby Lobby decision.

Volume

42

First Page

110

Publisher

Rutgers Law School

Keywords

Contraception, Reproductive Technology, Courts, First Amendment, Plaintiffs, Legal Practice and Procedure, Religion and the Law

Disciplines

Courts | First Amendment | Law | Tax Law

Download

Share

COinS