Publication Date
1-1990
Journal
Hastings Law Journal
Abstract
The article explores the interplay between jurisprudential and procedural perspectives on judicial discretion, arguing that these two discourses—often treated as distinct—offer valuable insights into each other. It examines how different models of discretion (skill, expediency, and creativity) operate within institutional frameworks, emphasizing the normative assumptions underlying their justifications. The analysis highlights the tension between rule-bound decision-making and the practical realities of judicial discretion, particularly in sentencing and appellate review.
Volume
41
Issue
2
First Page
231
Last Page
280
Publisher
UC Law San Francisco
Disciplines
Judges | Law
Recommended Citation
Charles M. Yablon,
Justifying the Judge's Hunch: An Essay on Discretion,
41
Hastings L.J.
231
(1990).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/418