Publication Date
3-2009
Journal
Georgetown Law Journal
Abstract
The article critiques the state of legal academia, arguing that it has become mired in mediocrity and disconnected from the pursuit of justice and creative thinking. It contends that legal education and scholarly discourse have been stifled by a focus on narrow, unimaginative logic, leading to a decline in intellectual rigor and a failure to inspire meaningful change.
Volume
97
Issue
3
First Page
857
Last Page
864
Publisher
Georgetown University Law Center
Disciplines
Commercial Law | Jurisprudence | Law
Recommended Citation
Richard H. Weisberg,
Daniel Arises: Notes (Such as 30 and 31) from the Schlagaground*,
97
Geo. L.J.
857
(2009).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/412

Comments
Essay and Responses