The Game of the Laws
Publication Date
12-1999
Journal
Political Theory
Abstract
The article explores Plato's Laws and its vision of the city as a "game" governed by strategic interaction, contrasting it with modern game theory. While both frameworks recognize the necessity of rational, maximizing behavior for civic order, Plato argues that such rationality is not inherent but must be cultivated through politics. The article contends that the *Laws* introduces a "second-order game" of law-giving, led by divine or godlike figures, which establishes the rules for the "first-order game" of civic life. This second-order game is driven by "intelligence" and "playfulness," which Plato sees as essential for maintaining civic cohesion and harmony. The article critiques game theory for assuming rationality without addressing the political and cultural conditions necessary to sustain it.
Volume
27
Issue
6
First Page
769
Last Page
788
Publisher
SAGE Publishing
DOI
10.1177/0090591799027006004
Disciplines
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | International Trade Law | Law | Law and Politics
Recommended Citation
Arthur J. Jacobson,
The Game of the Laws,
27
Pol. Theory
769
(1999).
10.1177/0090591799027006004