Publication Date

1999

Journal

Cornell Law Review

Abstract

The article critiques Calabresi and Melamed's trichotomy of property rights, arguing that it oversimplifies property as a binary relationship between subject and object, neglecting the complexities of enjoyment and third-party interests. By employing a feminist and Lacanian psychoanalytic perspective, the analysis highlights how this framework fails to address the dynamic, relational, and intersubjective nature of property, particularly in environmental disputes. The author advocates for a more inclusive understanding of property that incorporates both masculine and feminine metaphors, emphasizing the need to move beyond possession and exchange to recognize the mutual constitution of entitlements and law.

Volume

84

Issue

2

First Page

394

Last Page

503

Publisher

Cornell Law School

Disciplines

Intellectual Property Law | Jurisprudence | Law | Law and Gender

Share

COinS