Publication Date
2016
Journal
New York University Journal of Law and Business
Abstract
The article explores innovative models of litigation funding, particularly third-party financing, and their implications for access to justice and legal efficiency. It examines how different jurisdictions, such as Quebec and Australia, have implemented funding mechanisms to address gaps in legal representation and the challenges of aggregating claims. The analysis highlights the potential benefits of these models, including increased access to justice and economic efficiency, while also addressing concerns about legitimacy, corruption, and systemic biases.
Volume
12
Issue
3
First Page
569
Last Page
602
Publisher
New York University School of Law
Disciplines
Banking and Finance Law | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | Law
Recommended Citation
Anthony J. Sebok,
Panel 3: Litigation Funding as a Tool for Collective Actions and Arbitrations,
12
N.Y.U. J.L. & Bus.
569
(2016).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1504

Comments
Special Issue 2016: Proceedings of the 2015 Fall Conference with the Center on Civil Justice: Litigation Funding: The Basics and beyond