Publication Date
1998
Journal
Brooklyn Law Review
Abstract
The Adlman case, decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, significantly expanded the scope of the work product doctrine, particularly affecting corporate legal documents. The court adopted the "because of litigation" test, determining that documents created in anticipation of future litigation are protected, even if they serve dual purposes such as business strategy. This ruling has implications for how companies prepare for transactions and disputes, potentially shielding more strategic documents from discovery while maintaining exceptions for routine or regulatory documents.
Volume
64
Issue
2
First Page
627
Last Page
658
Publisher
Brooklyn Law School
Disciplines
Evidence | Law
Recommended Citation
Charles M. Yablon & Steven S. Sparling,
United States v. Adlman: Protection for Corporate Work Product?,
64
Brook. L. Rev.
627
(1998).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1482

Comments
The Second Circuit Review: 1997-98 Term: Corporate Work Product