Publication Date

6-2007

Journal

George Washington Law Review

Abstract

The article argues that the Chevron doctrine has effectively served as a means to moderate the hard-look review of agency rulemaking, rendering the anticipated Vermont Yankee II case unnecessary. It posits that Chevron's deference to agency interpretations of statutes has softened the impact of State Farm's stringent arbitrary-and-capricious review standard, aligning more closely with the judicial restraint envisioned by Vermont Yankee.

Volume

75

Issue

4

First Page

921

Last Page

930

Publisher

George Washington University Law School

Disciplines

Courts | Judges | Jurisprudence | Law

Share

COinS