Publication Date

2006

Journal

Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

Abstract

The article argues that the findings from the silica multidistrict litigation (MDL), presided over by U.S. District Court Judge Janis Jack, have significant implications for understanding the fraudulent practices in asbestos litigation. The author contends that both silica and asbestos litigations share a common "entrepreneurial model" where a small group of doctors and screening companies generate specious claims for financial gain, often without proper medical oversight. Judge Jack's findings in the silica MDL, which revealed widespread fraud and manipulation of medical diagnoses, corroborate the author's long-standing critique of asbestos litigation practices.

Volume

12

Issue

2

First Page

289

Last Page

314

Publisher

University of Connecticut School of Law

Disciplines

Labor and Employment Law | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility | Torts

Share

COinS