Barron's Complaint: A Response to ``Feminism, Aestheticism and the Limits of Law''

Publication Date

8-2001

Journal

Feminist Legal Studies

Abstract

In academic contexts, it is always likely thatan author who criticises another's work – in abook review, or an article – will know theother author personally. They may well befriends. Reflecting upon the intimacy of thepublic sphere, this article responds to thetone of a recent critique of the style andpolitics of postmodern jurisprudence. Questionsof style, tone and scriptural face are anunconventional point of entry into a discussionof feminism, aesthetics and law. It is arguedhere that these issues are intrinsic to theembodiment of theory that Barron proposes.

Volume

9

Issue

2

First Page

149

Last Page

170

Publisher

Springer Nature

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016719915380

Disciplines

Civil Rights and Discrimination | Constitutional Law | Law

Share

COinS