Publication Date
1994
Journal
Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie
Abstract
The article responds to Bert van Roermund's arguments about the relationship between law and literature, emphasizing that literature serves as a unique jurisprudential source when it mimetically imitates legal expression. The author argues that literature's value lies in its ability to capture the narrative structures of legal communication, particularly in genres like the novel or novella, which self-consciously replicate legal narrativity. This mimetic quality distinguishes literature from other forms of art and makes it uniquely relevant to legal theory.
Volume
23
Issue
3
First Page
228
Last Page
229
Publisher
Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy (NJLP)
Disciplines
International Law | Jurisprudence | Law | Law and Politics | Legislation
Recommended Citation
Richard H. Weisberg,
Response to Bert van Roermund,
23
R & R
228
(1994).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1274
Included in
International Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legislation Commons