Publication Date
1985
Journal
Banking Law Journal
Abstract
The article critiques the Second Circuit's decision in Dick Warner Cargo Handling Corp. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc., arguing that it unfairly prioritizes revolving credit financiers over lien creditors by reviving the unitary theory of security interests under Article 9 of the UCC. The authors defend the multiple theory, asserting that security interests for advances and nonadvance obligations should be treated separately, and that the court's ruling undermines the balance intended by the 1972 UCC amendments.
Volume
102
Issue
5
First Page
412
Last Page
435
Publisher
Matthew Bender & Company, Inc.
Disciplines
Bankruptcy Law | Insurance Law | Law | Legal Remedies
Recommended Citation
Jeanne L. Schroeder & David G. Carlson,
Future Nonadvance Obligations Under Article 9 of the UCC: Legitimate Priority or Unwarranted Squeeze-Out?,
102
Banking Law Journal
412
(1985).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1226