Publication Date
2025
Journal
St. John's Law Review
Abstract
The symposium examines the Supreme Court's recent trend of overturning precedent, arguing that this practice undermines the principle of *stare decisis* and the Court's legitimacy. Historically, the Court has used precedent to protect marginalized groups, but recent decisions suggest a shift toward benefiting non-marginalized interests, such as big businesses and conservative groups. This change is seen as a departure from the Court's traditional role and raises concerns about judicial humility and the politicization of the judiciary.
Volume
98
Issue
7
First Page
1327
Last Page
1327
Publisher
St. John's University School of Law
Disciplines
Common Law | Jurisprudence | Law | Supreme Court of the United States
Recommended Citation
Alicia Bannon, John Q. Barrett, Tyler R. Clemons, Wilfred U. Codrington III & Mark C. Niles,
Cross-Talk,
98
St. John's L. Rev.
1327
(2025).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1210
