Publication Date
Summer 1992
Journal
South Carolina Law Review
Abstract
From the time that the first lawyers set foot in what is now the United States, society has engaged in efforts to regulate lawyers' fees, including fees received from clients in bankruptcy proceedings. Lawyers, in turn, have been engaged in continuing efforts to: secure their self-interests, aggrandize their role in society, be free of societally imposed constraints on their fees and activities, and carve out an ever larger area of exclusive domain. Although lawyers have not fared as well in their recent efforts to extend the scope of their monopoly by the use of statutes that prohibit the unauthorized practice of law and may even be on the verge of seeing their monopoly erode, they have been more successful in securing other aspects of their self-interest and in using their positions of authority to create rules exempting themselves from the reach of laws and doctrines that they, as lawyers, have been instrumental in establishing or enacting to regulate the conduct of others.
Volume
43
Issue
4
First Page
1037
Last Page
1102
Publisher
University of South Carolina School of Law
Keywords
Bankruptcy Law, Bankruptcy, Legal Practice and Procedure, Legal Profession, Professional Ethics in Law, Remedies
Disciplines
Bankruptcy Law | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility | Legal Profession | Legal Remedies
Recommended Citation
Lester Brickman & Jonathan Klein,
The Use of Advance Fee Attorney Retainer Agreements in Bankruptcy: Another Special Law for Lawyers?,
43
S. C. L. Rev.
1037
(1992).
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/1167
Included in
Bankruptcy Law Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal Profession Commons, Legal Remedies Commons

Comments
Symposium on Bankruptcy: The Trustee's Avoiding Powers