Publication Date

3-1985

Journal

Iowa Law Review

Abstract

The article examines the legal and policy implications of enforcing contractual servitudes that bind successors-in-interest to land, arguing that unrestricted enforcement could lead to significant externalities and transaction costs. While Richard Epstein advocates for maximal contractual freedom, the analysis highlights the need for doctrinal limitations to protect future generations and public interests. The article critiques existing doctrines like the touch and concern requirement, changed conditions doctrine, and durational limitations, proposing reforms to balance private autonomy with broader societal concerns.

Volume

70

Issue

3

First Page

615

Last Page

662

Publisher

University of Iowa College of Law

Disciplines

Land Use Law | Law | Natural Resources Law | Science and Technology Law

Download

Share

COinS