Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
Abstract
The note argues that amnesty can be a necessary and effective tool for achieving peace in conflict-ridden regions, even when the International Criminal Court (ICC) is involved. It focuses on Uganda's situation, where the government's amnesty offer to the Lords Resistance Army (LRA) was crucial for a ceasefire. The analysis suggests that the ICC should consider deferring to national processes, such as Uganda's Amnesty Act of 2000, to support transitional justice and reconciliation, rather than prioritizing prosecution. The note concludes that amnesty, integrated with traditional justice mechanisms, can be both legally permissible and morally justifiable in certain contexts.
Disciplines
Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | International Law | Law | Military, War, and Peace
Recommended Citation
Kathleen E. MacMillan,
The Practicability of Amnesty As a Non-Prosecutory Alternative in Post-Conflict Uganda,
6
Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J.
199
(2007).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cplpej/vol6/iss1/8
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, International Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons