•  
  •  
 

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

Abstract

The note argues that the current legal framework for forcibly medicating mentally ill criminal defendants, particularly pre-trial detainees, often violates their constitutional rights. It contends that the reliance on "dangerousness" as a criterion for forced medication is too vague and easily abused, leading to inconsistent and unconstitutional applications. The analysis advocates for stricter standards, clearer definitions of dangerousness, and heightened judicial scrutiny to protect the rights of mentally ill defendants.

Disciplines

Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Food and Drug Law | Law | Psychiatry and Psychology

Share

COinS