Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
Abstract
The article explores the tension between national security interests and procedural fairness in the use of secret evidence across non-Article III contexts, including military tribunals, Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRTs), and immigration courts. It examines the challenges of balancing government secrecy with individual rights, emphasizing the need for procedural safeguards to navigate this complex issue.
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | Courts | Evidence | Immigration Law | Jurisprudence | Law | Military, War, and Peace
Recommended Citation
Robert M. Chesney,
Panel Report: Beyond Article III Courts: Military Tribunals, Status Review Tribunals, and Immigration Courts,
5
Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J.
27
(2006).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cplpej/vol5/iss1/5
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Courts Commons, Evidence Commons, Immigration Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons