Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
Abstract
The note explores the legal implications of cybergripping under the Lanham Act, emphasizing the need to balance trademark protection with free speech. It critiques the inconsistent application of the commercial-noncommercial distinction in determining the legality of unauthorized trademark use and advocates for adopting the Central Hudson test to reconcile these competing interests.
Disciplines
Intellectual Property Law | Law | Legal Profession | Legislation
Recommended Citation
Blossom Lefcourt,
The Prosecution of Cybergripers Under the Lanham Act,
3
Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J.
269
(2004).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cplpej/vol3/iss1/19
COinS