Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
Abstract
The article explores why Hegel's philosophy, typically structured in triads, includes four judgments instead of three. It argues that the four judgments—existence, reflection, necessity, and notion—are necessary to account for the external reflection or "silent fourth," a hidden element influencing the system. This structure deviates from Hegel's usual triadic approach to incorporate an essential mediator, crucial for his logical framework.
Disciplines
Jurisprudence | Law | Law and Society | Legal History
Recommended Citation
David G. Carlson,
Why Are There Four Hegelian Judgments?,
3
Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J.
143
(2004).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cplpej/vol3/iss1/12