Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
Abstract
The article argues that the forms of judgment are central to objective thought and knowledge, critiquing Kant for failing to account for their diversity and proposing a systematic approach to understanding judgment starting from the concept itself. It explores Hegel's differentiation of judgment forms through self-development, emphasizing the necessity of understanding universals and their interrelations.
Disciplines
Communications Law | Intellectual Property Law | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility | Philosophy
Recommended Citation
Richard D. Winfield,
The Types of Universals and the Forms of Judgment,
3
Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J.
125
(2004).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cplpej/vol3/iss1/11
Included in
Communications Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Philosophy Commons