Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
Abstract
The article argues that the death penalty in the United States is plagued by significant conceptual and empirical flaws, particularly regarding its reliability and fairness. The author advocates for a moratorium on the death penalty until these issues are addressed, emphasizing the risk of executing innocent individuals and the lack of sufficient safeguards in capital proceedings. While not calling for outright abolition, the article contends that the current system is too flawed to continue without substantial reforms.
Disciplines
Criminal Law | Criminal Procedure | Judges | Law | Law and Society
Recommended Citation
Jason Borenstein,
The Death Penalty: Conceptual and Empirical Issues,
2
Cardozo Pub. L. Pol’y & Ethics J.
377
(2004).
Available at:
https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cplpej/vol2/iss2/5
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Judges Commons, Law and Society Commons